Nairobi — On paper, federalism appears to be central to today’s Somalia. “Federal Republic” is part of its official name. It is run by a “federal national government”. “Federal, sovereign and democratic” are the country’s defining characteristics, according to Article 1 of the 2012 provisional constitution, a document in which the word “federal” appears 710 times.

But in the wake of more than two decades of civil war and state collapse, Somalis disagree about whether federalism is a recipe for sustainable peace – and even whether such a system is practicable.

This briefing examines the issues.

What does federalism mean in Somalia?

Federalism is an ambiguous notion, involving relationships between central and peripheral power structures that vary widely from country to country.

In Somalia, the constitution outlines the connections between the central government and future “federal member states,” but the precise roles and responsibilities of each level of government are not specified.

Article 54 states: “The allocation of powers and resources shall be negotiated and agreed upon by the Federal Government and the Federal Member States” pending their creation, except in the areas of foreign affairs, national defense, citizenship and immigration, and monetary policy, which are all under the purview of the central government, based in the capital, Mogadishu.

The federal member states will be represented in parliament through the Federal State’s upper house of parliament, which has yet to be created.

“My own feeling is that the nature of Somali federalism remains far from agreed,” Michael Walls, senior lecturer at University College London and a leading expert on Somalia, told IRIN by email.

Is federalism new in Somalia?

“Somalia has tried many systems of governance since its independence,” Abdulkadir Suleiman Mohamed, a writer and political analyst, told IRIN. After independence, the country followed the British model of a parliamentary system, until the 1969 coup d’état, when the military government installed a “scientifically Socialist” state.


Since 2004, the country has moved toward a federal system, not because it is inherently better, Mohamed said, but because, “Somali people don’t trust each other.”

“Resource-sharing, power¬-sharing, political representation – all have been abused by certain people in the higher ranks of the government. Welfare services have never been delivered. Local constituents never received their share of national resources. So federalism was proposed a way forward in Somali politics,” he said.

Abdi Aynte, director of the Heritage Institute for Policy Studies (HIPS), agreed that Somalia has come to see federalism as a viable solution to restoring peace. “Due to the prolonged civil war and the resulting trust deficit, Somalis are yearning for local control of their politics. Decentralization, or any other form of federalism, is the answer to their quest,” he told IRIN by email.

“Federalism will disperse power among the states, and will thus reduce the concentration of power on central hands. It is the best form administration we can implement today in Somalia,” Mohamed Nurani Bakar, a member of parliament, told IRIN. The “unitary system of governance has brought us a lot of problems that are still with us today,” he said.

Who creates the federal member states?

The process of creating most federal states has been fraught with delays, contestation and confusion. Under the provisional constitution, all federal states must be built from among the 18 regions that existed prior to the civil war. “Two or more regions may merge to form a Federal Member State,” according to the constitution.

But an independent boundaries and federation commission, responsible for determining the number and boundaries of federal states, has yet to be formed by parliament’s lower house, leaving regions unsure of their legal status under the provisional constitution.

The commission was meant to be appointed 60 days after the new Council of Ministers was formed following the passage of the draft constitution in 2012, but that never happened.

“The creation of Federal Member States proved to be a very controversial issue during the constitutional conferences leading to this Draft Provisional Constitution,” noted a guidebook created by the UN Political Office for Somalia. For this reason, the constitution specified that the process of deciding federal member states will be carried out by the independent commission comprising representatives from all of Somalia and international experts.

Officially, no federal member states exist yet, and the government has until elections in 2016 to create them. It is widely expected that Puntland is the closest to achieving federal state status, and could be a model for other states. Jubaland and Galmudug also have state-building efforts underway, although there is a lot of in-fighting at the local level. Jubaland has two rival talks going on while Galmudug has three or four.

What’s the importance of Puntland?

Puntland has described itself as a semi-autonomous entity since 1998 with varying relations with Mogadishu. A recent presidential election, won by Abdiweli Gaas, seems to have put an end to a period of animosity.

Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud reacted in a statement: “I extend my personal congratulations to Abdiweli Mohammed Ali Gaas and I look forward to working closely with him as the government continues to build a federal Somalia.

“Puntland is a model for the rest of the country and what happens there matters very much.”

Gaas’s predecessor, Abdirahman Mohamed Faroole, “used the conflict/tension with Mogadishu to shore up his domestic – i.e., Puntland – support base, whereas Abdiweli Gaas draws his strongest support from international actors and many in Mogadishu,” said Walls.

“To that extent, I would expect the relationship between Puntland and Mogadishu to improve under Abdiweli’s presidency, and he did underline his desire to see such an improvement in his inauguration speech.”

“I do not think that a strongly centralized federal system is likely to be accepted by most Somalis,” he said, adding: “Puntland is therefore very important as an expression of what a loosely federated state might look like.”

What is happening in Jubaland?

There are two separate processes taking place in Jubaland. One is the Intergovernmental Authority on Development-brokered talks between a delegation led by the Ras Kamboni movement (a paramilitary group opposed to Al-Shabab) leader Ahmad Madobe, and the SFG. In August, they signed an agreement in Addis Ababa, creating a Juba Interim Administration led by Madobe that will be in place for two years.

The talks say that during this time, “subject to the constitutional process, a permanent Federal Member State will be established.” The crucial port of Kismayo and the airport will be managed by the national government during this time.

The formation of Jubaland in southern Somalia was initially met with opposition from Mogadishu, which accused a conference of stakeholders in February 2013 of being unconstitutional because it was “carried out without reference to the federal government.” Politicians in the Juba and Gedo regions, areas in the proposed borders, also protested that the Jubaland leadership would not be representative of all of the clans living in the region.

A separate bid to join regions in Jubaland is also progressing. The Baidoa conference is attempting to join together Lower Juba, Middle Juba, Lower Shabell, Bay, Bakool and Gedo. The conference has been ongoing for over a year, with some support from the federal government, despite the SFG having signed the Addis Agreement.

Tensions are running high between the rival state formation talks. Last week, reports emerged that troops from the African Union Mission in Somalia had attempted to take over the conference hall where the Baidoa conference was taking place, to stop the meeting.

Nicholas Kay, the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Somalia, said that it was important that stakeholders continue to meet in Baidoa, noting that “nobody should risk taking steps that spoil peace-and-state-building processes.” He also asked that “all parties remain calm, committed to dialogue and support reconciliation efforts.”

Jubaland will have significant regional importance – the Kenyan government would view it as a vital buffer zone between Somalia and northern Kenya, offering protection against Al-Shabab. Ethiopia would also see it as a vital shield to its territory, provided Jubaland’s leadership was not sympathetic to the Ethiopian rebel group Ogaden National Liberation Front.

What are some of the other challenges facing federalism?

Civic education, distribution of resources between state and national governments, and the status of Mogadishu are also major challenges.

Aynte of HIPS recommends the creation of a body responsible for national civic education on federalism. Most people are not aware how diverse federalism is or the options available for decentralization. There also needs to be national dialogue on the role of national and local authorities in controlling revenues from natural resources, he believes.

“One area where there is real potential for revenue, the exploitation of natural resources, has been postponed to an unspecified time due to the controversy it has already raised between Puntland and the TFG [Transitional Federal Government – the former name for the SFG],” said Issa Mohamud Farah, director general of the Puntland Petroleum Minerals Agency. “In a country where agriculture is marginal, manufacturing is non-existent and the service sector is limited, the potential importance of revenue from petroleum and mineral resources is not to be underestimated.”

This is likely to be an area of conflict between the federal states and central government, which would want greater control of oil revenues, Farah believes.

Somalia President Mohamud also acknowledged that this is a major difficulty. “We don’t have resource-sharing, we don’t have revenue-sharing, we don’t have many, many more things to share,” he said at an event at London’s Chatham House in February 2013. “If we do not put those tools and instruments in place then federalism will create more problems.”

Third, the issue of the status of Mogadishu has yet to be discussed. It could occupy the place of a special city outside of the federal states system, like Washington, DC, or Canberra. Analysts believe that this debate will be likely to come to the fore once federal boundaries have been negotiated and delineated.

“In a post-conflict environment, the process of state-formation normally leads to conflict,” Aynte noted, indicating that to expect the system to work immediately would be naïve. “Federalism will continue to be a source of both harmony and contestation. And that’s to be expected. In the interim, it’s going to be difficult, but eventually it will work out.”

Are there any opponents to federalism?

Yes, some. Opponents of the federal project worry that it could lead to fragmentation and clan violence.

“Federalism is a destructive force for Somalia, and it will continue to remain one whose woes will haunt Somalia,” Abdulkadir Sheikh Ismail, former chairman of the parliamentary committee on constitutional affairs, told IRIN. If “regional state interests take prominence over the national interest, the common interest is lost as a result, and that could set a dangerous precedent,” he added.

Mohamed Hassan Haad, a well-known traditional elder, is also skeptical. “Somalis do not understand what federalism is. It does not serve the interest of Somali people and will remain an intractable problem in the long run. It is going to set one clan against the other,” he told IRIN. “Somalis have been fighting over clan and religious issues for two decades, and federalism is nothing but a new source or cycle of conflict over land and ownership.”

Asked about what he thought of federalism, 23-year-old Ayuub Suleiman Jama, who grew up experiencing years of clan clashes and religious fanaticism, responded without hesitation. “Division,” he said.

“The establishment of a federalism of the clan, rather than a regional one” is a serious risk, according to Marco Zoppi, a freelance political analyst. “The current distribution of the clan already lends itself to a phenomenon of this kind.”

Most people in Somalia, however, recognize that there has to be some form of power-sharing, and that is best done through a form of federalism. But Farah warned, “Without a strong commitment from the federal government, federalism will not flourish in Somalia.”

[ This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. ]

Source :IRIN


  1. The Tigre Zenawi was the one who introduced "fedralism" to Zoomalians, because it was easy for him as Ethiopia itself was trying to implement some sort of federal system due to the many ethnic regions that exist within Ethiopia.

    "Mohamed Hassan Haad, a well-known traditional elder, is also skeptical. “Somalis do not understand what federalism …"

    Yes, because they do not have an ownership of "federalism". States have to work together and also with main government in federalism, but Zoomalians are Jahil people who only understand causing destructions to their neighbours.

  2. Federalism will not work because the people will choose to exploit it's inherent flaws. It is foundation is flawed as the majority have no interest or understanding of the mechanics.

    Flaw 1: There is unresolved future relations of the TWO countries(Somaliland & Somalia-Italia) that voluntarily established an un-ratified UNION between 1960 to 1991. As such the intention of federalism being implemented in 18-Provinces of the dissolved Union is a recipe for failure.

    If however Federalism is implemented in the territory of the One states(Somalia-Italia) who formed the road-Map signatories and chose federalism and it's federal interim-constitution then the chances of success are increased.

    Flaw 2: Somalia-Italia's federal framework is based on Provinces pre-1991 and any two or more provinces are able to unite to form a federal state. Somalia-Italia had 12-provinces in the Union as such the maximum number of Federal states will be SIX-states and the minimum ONE-State.

    In the event there are SIX states:

    – Darood will have Two-States[puntland & Jubaland]
    – Hawiye will have Three-States[East-Central, Central & Banaadir)
    – D&M will have One-State[Maayland]

    This leaves Zero political representation for minorities, who will be forced to live under the dominance of the Three clans that have always occupied the seats of President, Prime minister and Speaker of Parliament.

    Clan federalism will lead to further divisions and propagate the non-functional status of a federal government. The only remedy would be to limit federal states to three.

    North-State: Bari, nugaal, mudug + Galgaduud
    Central-State: Hiraan, Sh.dhexe, sh.hoose + Bakool
    South-State: Bay, gedo, Juba.Dh + Juba.H

    Each state would get one of the Top-Three seats in politics and all clans would have a fair chance to compete for any political post passed on capability. The main achievement would be promotion of coexistence and interaction where all clans would have representation within each state. This model would best serve to deliver fairness to all minorities who otherwise are left disfranchised.

    Over time a Three state federal framework would minimize fragmentation and help rebuild the necessary trust to work towards a functional state that solidifies it unity and coexistence. Federalism can be employed to bring the people closer together however if clans are permitted to hijack the formation process it will inevitably become the very instrument that creates endless clan fiefdoms all at war with each other.

    Unitary centralism Vs Three-state federalism

    It is not the system but rather who is using it and to what end?

  3. The Somalia they are talking about includes Somaliland as a federal member state dummies, just like other garden varieties whether federal system works or not.

    • Somalia-Italia-Federation & Somaliland-Republic have an ongoing dialogue process as TWO-EQUAL states with EQUAL ownership over the direction and conclusion of the dialogue process… I do hope that is clear?

      Now The Road-Map signatories and the dialogue process in Gerowe-I & Gerowe-II and the subsequent adoption of an interim Somalia-Italia-Constitution was the work of solely "Somalia-Italia" + Mahiga + Igad and their sponsors… Hope that is also clear?

      Somalia-Italia-Federations is building a political framework founded on the security provided by Amisom and with interference from neighboring states with a vested interest in the failure of your country of Somalia-Italia. Federalism is the BUTCHER that has been contracted to slaughter what remains of the carcass known as Somalia-Italia. Even with 20,000 Amisom troops your federal government has ZERO control or legitimacy outside it's Vila-Amisom. Each of your federal-states is content with that and would like to see an insignificant Paper government based in muuqdisho with a title of federal government. A perfect example is the $1million promised by Hassan Mahamoud to Gerowe natural disaster in 2013 which is yet to deliver. No sooner the Amisom troops vacate Muuqdisho and federal-state-wars erupt with no end…

      Federalism = Legitimizing of political failure

      It is retarded to preach Federalism & Unionism in the same statement.

  4. On federal aspect I agree with my brother Buxiye. Regarding, resource Somalis by nature share resources such as pasture land, water points etc without exception even during conflict period within and beyond political boundaries. Their Slogan urge them to hep their poor member and that is why they provide asset building etc support to them . So the matter is rather healing the wound of political mistrust created during and after revolution. Somalis need more trust building and more dialogues.