By Goth Mohamed Goth

HARGEISA – The President of the Republic of Somaliland, H.E. Abdirahman Mohamed Abdillahi (Irro), held a high-level meeting today at the Presidential Palace with Kenyan Member of Parliament Mpuru Aburi, who represents the Tigania East constituency, alongside a delegation of accompanying investors.

The President was joined in the talks by the Chairman of the WADDANI Party, H.E. Hirsi Ali Haji Hassan, and the Party’s Deputy Chairman, Mohamed Haji Yusuf (Waabeeyo).

Discussions centered on deepening bilateral ties and fostering strategic cooperation between Somaliland and Kenya, with particular emphasis on political engagement, trade, investment, economic development, and shared growth opportunities that promise mutual benefits for both nations and their peoples.

Welcoming the delegation’s visit, President Irro reaffirmed Somaliland’s unwavering commitment to regional collaboration and private sector development. He underscored that the country is actively working to create a favorable business climate, attract foreign direct investment, and harness its abundant natural resources—stressing that Somaliland remains open for business and ready to partner with international stakeholders.

In response, Hon. Mpuru Aburi expressed his sincere gratitude for the warm reception extended to his team. He affirmed his strong dedication to strengthening the partnership between the two republics and pledged to play a personal and proactive role in advancing shared priorities—vowing to champion initiatives that serve the common interests of both countries and their citizens.

By Goth Mohamed Goth

HARGEISA – August 1, 2026 – The Standing and Ethics Committee of Somaliland’s House of Representatives convened a formal hearing today with representatives of a professional civil society organization, during which the delegation submitted a formal complaint regarding grievances affecting their professional activities.

The meeting was chaired by the Committee Chairman, Hon. Mahmoud Hayir Du’ale, alongside committee members and staff. The civil society representatives presented a comprehensive account of the challenges they have encountered, outlining the specific obstacles they face and proposing potential legal remedies for the issues raised. They further appealed to the Committee to exercise its constitutional mandate—to hear, assess, and refer their grievances to the appropriate authorities with a view to reaching a lasting resolution.

In response, Committee members posed detailed questions to the delegation to verify the information and substantiate the claims made. The representatives answered all queries thoroughly and transparently.

Chairman Du’ale commended the organization for choosing the lawful avenue of bringing their concerns before the legislature. He emphasized that the Committee is duty-bound to receive public complaints, investigate matters brought to its attention, and ensure they are handled in strict compliance with the Constitution and national laws.

The Chairman also affirmed that the Committee will conduct a rigorous review of the submitted complaint and take all necessary measures to ensure that the issues are addressed equitably, while safeguarding the rights and interests of the citizens involved.

By Goth Mohamed Goth

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has formally called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio to direct the State Department to conduct a tiered Diplomatic Security assessment of Somalia and establish a standalone, region‑specific Travel Advisory for Somaliland.

In a letter dated July 28, 2026, Senator Cruz argues that the current Level 4 “Do Not Travel” warning—which applies uniformly across all of Somalia—is profoundly misaligned with conditions on the ground in Somaliland. The existing advisory, which cites dangers ranging from terrorism and kidnapping to piracy, landmines, and systemic human rights abuses, paints an indiscriminate picture that the senator says does not reflect the self‑governing region’s reality.

A Record of Stability and Democracy

Somaliland, Senator Cruz notes, has operated as a stable, democratic, and self‑administered nation for nearly three decades. Since 2003, it has successfully conducted multiple peaceful and competitive elections—a track record that sets it apart from the chronic insecurity and institutional dysfunction afflicting southern and central Somalia.

The senator contends that Washington’s blanket policy effectively “punishes success and rewards failure,” treating one of America’s most dependable partners in the Horn of Africa no differently than its most unstable conflict zones. “In doing so,” he writes, “the Department sends precisely the wrong message.”

Economic and Diplomatic Costs

The current advisory, according to Cruz, carries tangible consequences. It discourages American private sector investment, complicates official U.S. government travel, and stifles diplomatic engagement at a moment when deeper ties would serve American strategic interests. Notably, official travel conducted entirely within Somaliland remains encumbered by burdensome security protocols—including coordination through Mogadishu—that consume taxpayer resources without providing any meaningful security benefit, given Somaliland’s favorable environment.

A Precedent for Common‑Sense Approach

Cruz highlights that the State Department already employs a state‑by‑state advisory system for Mexico, tailoring guidance to distinct regional security conditions. He sees no justification for failing to apply that same nuanced framework to Somaliland. He specifically urges an updated Diplomatic Security tiered assessment—noting that current data dates back to the early 1990s—to ensure that official protocols and public guidance are grounded in contemporary, factual conditions.

Conclusion

“Americans deserve travel guidance that reflects the conditions on the ground, rather than a one‑size‑fits‑all assessment,” Senator Cruz asserted, reaffirming his readiness to provide any resources or support necessary to achieve these objectives.

The appeal adds to a growing chorus of voices calling for the United States to recalibrate its engagement with Somaliland, recognizing its distinct governance and security landscape as a strategic asset in the Horn of Africa.

By Goth Mohamed Goth

Hargeisa – The President of the Republic of Somaliland, His Excellency Abdirahman Mohamed Abdillahi (Irro), made an early morning visit today to the Kidney Dialysis Unit at Hargeisa General Hospital. During his visit, he met one-on-one with the patients reliant on the service, gaining firsthand insight into their health conditions and the challenges they sometimes face.

The President listened closely to the patients’ complaints and needs, emphasizing that healthcare is a national obligation and that the Government bears the utmost responsibility for ensuring access to quality medical services.

During the course of his visit, the President received a detailed briefing from the General Director of Hargeisa Hospital, who provided an update on the current state of the dialysis service, existing needs, and the obstacles hindering its operations.

President Irro pledged that the Government would promptly address the needs and grievances within the dialysis service, particularly concerning dialysis machines, medical supplies, and other essential equipment required to sustain this life-saving service for patients who regularly depend on kidney dialysis.

By Goth Mohamed Goth

GABILEY – In a significant political development underscoring the government’s ongoing reconciliation drive, the city of Gabiley played host on Thursday to a high-level reception for four public officials from the eastern regions of Sool and Sanaag, who have formally rescinded their prior political stances and officially rejoined the Republic of Somaliland.

The successful negotiation and subsequent defection of these Members of Parliament were orchestrated with the critical assistance of Mr. Jama Ayaanle Feyte, a preeminent Somali journalist and a seasoned analyst of Horn of Africa security dynamics. Widely recognized for his incisive scholarly work on governance frameworks, grassroots conflict-resolution mechanisms, and cross-border regional integration, Feyte acted as a pivotal intermediary throughout the delicate dialogue process. His extensive expertise in regional security architecture and his trusted relationships with stakeholders on both sides proved instrumental in bridging the trust deficit, ultimately paving the way for the officials’ decision to return to the Somaliland fold.

Upon their arrival in Gabiley, the returnees were accorded an elaborate ceremonial welcome by the Gabiley regional and district administrations. The reception was characterized by the unfurling of the Somaliland national flag, alongside an emphatic show of solidarity from local community members—a powerful visual testament to the city’s readiness to embrace reconciliation over division. The atmosphere was one of warmth and hospitality, reflecting the broader national sentiment of inclusivity.

Following the initial proceedings in Gabiley, the delegation was transported to the Bari Checkpoint in Caabud’la, a strategic location where they were formally received by a high-powered government delegation. This entourage was led by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Yaasin Haji Mahamud Hiir (Faratoon), alongside the Minister of Interior and Security, several other cabinet ministers, revered traditional elders (cuqaal), prominent academics, and representatives from diverse civil society organizations. The presence of such a broad cross-section of Somali leadership underscored the political weight attached to this homecoming.

In their respective addresses, the dignitaries collectively reaffirmed their unwavering support for the officials’ return, framing the event not merely as a political realignment but as a profound victory for dialogue, mutual understanding, and collective national purpose. They lauded the returning officials for prioritizing the unity and stability of Somaliland over partisan or regional differences.

Political observers view this homecoming as a strategic win for Somaliland’s ongoing efforts to consolidate unity across its eastern frontiers. Against the backdrop of prior regional tensions, the defection of these high-profile figures signals a promising shift toward lasting stability and reinforces the administration’s commitment to resolving grievances through inclusive negotiation and shared governance.

‎A skyline built by local hands: Hargeisa embodies the argument that stability is not inherited but earned
‎
‎There is a tendency to believe that the future of global governance will be shaped exclusively in the world’s great capitals or within the chambers of its established institutions. Yet hiA skyline built by local hands: Hargeisa embodies the argument that stability is not inherited but earned

There is a tendency to believe that the future of global governance will be shaped exclusively in the world’s great capitals or within the chambers of its established institutions. Yet history often teaches a different lesson. Some of the most important insights into the nature of political order emerge not from states that inherited stability, but from societies that have had to build it for themselves.

Across the Horn of Africa, where strategic competition, demographic change and economic opportunity increasingly converge, the challenges confronting the international community are neither theoretical nor distant. They are immediate and practical. How does peace endure after conflict? How are institutions built where none previously existed? How can democratic legitimacy take root in difficult circumstances? And what should the international community do when political reality evolves more rapidly than the frameworks designed to recognise it?

For more than three decades, Somaliland has sought to answer these questions not through rhetoric but through experience. It has maintained peace where conflict once prevailed, developed democratic institutions through successive elections, strengthened the rule of law, and contributed to regional stability in one of the world’s most strategically significant regions. It has done so largely through local initiative, political compromise and public consent rather than external administration or prolonged international intervention.

The lessons from that experience extend beyond Somaliland itself. They speak to a broader challenge confronting the international system: how to preserve a rules-based international order while ensuring that it remains sufficiently adaptable to recognise and encourage responsible governance wherever it emerges. As Europe and its partners consider the future of global governance, the Horn of Africa offers not merely a theatre of strategic competition, but a laboratory of political resilience whose experience deserves closer attention.

Governance Begins With Legitimacy

Much contemporary debate about international order focuses on institutions, treaties and diplomatic architecture. These remain indispensable. Yet they are ultimately instruments rather than foundations. The true foundation of any durable political order is legitimacy: the confidence of citizens that public institutions exist to serve the common good, resolve disputes peacefully and provide security under the rule of law.

Legitimacy cannot simply be conferred from outside. It is earned through consistent governance, accountability and the patient construction of public trust. The most enduring political institutions are those that grow from local ownership and reflect the aspirations of the societies they serve. This principle is neither uniquely African nor uniquely European. It is universal.

Somaliland’s experience illustrates this reality. Emerging from the devastation of civil war in 1991, communities, elders, civic leaders and political representatives embarked upon a process of reconciliation that was rooted in dialogue rather than coercion. Institutions were not imported wholesale from abroad; they evolved through consultation and adaptation. Traditional mechanisms of consensus complemented constitutional development, while democratic elections progressively strengthened public confidence in representative government.

This experience challenges a common assumption in international affairs: that legitimacy flows primarily from formal recognition. Recognition undoubtedly matters. It facilitates international engagement, investment and cooperation. Yet recognition alone cannot create effective governance. Nor should the absence of recognition obscure the presence of functioning democratic institutions, peaceful political competition and responsible public administration. If global governance is to remain credible, it must increasingly evaluate political realities not only through inherited legal frameworks but also through demonstrable performance.

Stability as a Strategic Asset

In the twenty-first century, stability has become one of the world’s most valuable strategic resources. It cannot be taken for granted. Across multiple regions, governments confront transnational terrorism, organised crime, cyber threats, irregular migration, environmental pressures and economic uncertainty. The capacity of states to withstand these challenges increasingly determines regional and international security.

For Europe, these developments are not remote. The security of maritime trade routes, the resilience of supply chains and the management of migration all depend upon stable partnerships beyond the continent’s borders. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Horn of Africa, whose geography places it at the intersection of Africa, the Middle East and the wider Indo-Pacific.

Too often, however, the region has been viewed primarily through the language of crisis. Conflict, humanitarian emergencies and geopolitical rivalry have dominated international attention. These challenges are real and deserve sustained engagement. Yet they do not tell the whole story. The Horn is also a region of innovation, entrepreneurship, democratic aspiration and growing economic integration. It is home to societies investing in infrastructure, expanding regional trade and strengthening institutions capable of supporting long-term development.

The international community should therefore broaden its understanding of stability. Stability is not simply the absence of conflict; it is the presence of capable institutions, accountable governance and public confidence in constitutional processes. These qualities cannot be manufactured quickly in response to crisis. They require patient investment over many years. When societies demonstrate that commitment, international partnerships should reinforce and encourage those efforts.

The Rules-Based Order Must Continue to Evolve

Europe has consistently championed the importance of a rules-based international order. This commitment has served the international community well by promoting peaceful dispute resolution, sovereign equality and respect for international law. At a time of increasing geopolitical competition, these principles remain indispensable.

Yet the strength of any rules-based system depends upon its capacity for renewal. Institutions that cannot adapt to changing political realities risk losing both effectiveness and legitimacy. History demonstrates that international governance has never been static. The institutions created after 1945 have themselves evolved repeatedly in response to decolonisation, economic globalisation and technological transformation.

Today’s international landscape presents new questions. How should international institutions engage with societies that demonstrate effective governance despite unusual political circumstances? How should democratic resilience be encouraged in regions facing persistent instability? And how can multilateral organisations remain sufficiently flexible to reward responsible behaviour while preserving the stability of the wider international system?
story often teaches a different lesson. Some of the most important insights into the nature of political order emerge not from states that inherited stability, but from societies that have had to build it for themselves.
‎
‎Across the Horn of Africa, where strategic competition, demographic change and economic opportunity increasingly converge, the challenges confronting the international community are neither theoretical nor distant. They are immediate and practical. How does peace endure after conflict? How are institutions built where none previously existed? How can democratic legitimacy take root in difficult circumstances? And what should the international community do when political reality evolves more rapidly than the frameworks designed to recognise it?
‎
‎For more than three decades, Somaliland has sought to answer these questions not through rhetoric but through experience. It has maintained peace where conflict once prevailed, developed democratic institutions through successive elections, strengthened the rule of law, and contributed to regional stability in one of the world’s most strategically significant regions. It has done so largely through local initiative, political compromise and public consent rather than external administration or prolonged international intervention.
‎
‎The lessons from that experience extend beyond Somaliland itself. They speak to a broader challenge confronting the international system: how to preserve a rules-based international order while ensuring that it remains sufficiently adaptable to recognise and encourage responsible governance wherever it emerges. As Europe and its partners consider the future of global governance, the Horn of Africa offers not merely a theatre of strategic competition, but a laboratory of political resilience whose experience deserves closer attention.
‎
‎Governance Begins With Legitimacy
‎
‎Much contemporary debate about international order focuses on institutions, treaties and diplomatic architecture. These remain indispensable. Yet they are ultimately instruments rather than foundations. The true foundation of any durable political order is legitimacy: the confidence of citizens that public institutions exist to serve the common good, resolve disputes peacefully and provide security under the rule of law.
‎
‎Legitimacy cannot simply be conferred from outside. It is earned through consistent governance, accountability and the patient construction of public trust. The most enduring political institutions are those that grow from local ownership and reflect the aspirations of the societies they serve. This principle is neither uniquely African nor uniquely European. It is universal.
‎
‎Somaliland’s experience illustrates this reality. Emerging from the devastation of civil war in 1991, communities, elders, civic leaders and political representatives embarked upon a process of reconciliation that was rooted in dialogue rather than coercion. Institutions were not imported wholesale from abroad; they evolved through consultation and adaptation. Traditional mechanisms of consensus complemented constitutional development, while democratic elections progressively strengthened public confidence in representative government.
‎
‎This experience challenges a common assumption in international affairs: that legitimacy flows primarily from formal recognition. Recognition undoubtedly matters. It facilitates international engagement, investment and cooperation. Yet recognition alone cannot create effective governance. Nor should the absence of recognition obscure the presence of functioning democratic institutions, peaceful political competition and responsible public administration. If global governance is to remain credible, it must increasingly evaluate political realities not only through inherited legal frameworks but also through demonstrable performance.
‎
‎Stability as a Strategic Asset
‎
‎In the twenty-first century, stability has become one of the world’s most valuable strategic resources. It cannot be taken for granted. Across multiple regions, governments confront transnational terrorism, organised crime, cyber threats, irregular migration, environmental pressures and economic uncertainty. The capacity of states to withstand these challenges increasingly determines regional and international security.
‎
‎For Europe, these developments are not remote. The security of maritime trade routes, the resilience of supply chains and the management of migration all depend upon stable partnerships beyond the continent’s borders. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Horn of Africa, whose geography places it at the intersection of Africa, the Middle East and the wider Indo-Pacific.
‎
‎Too often, however, the region has been viewed primarily through the language of crisis. Conflict, humanitarian emergencies and geopolitical rivalry have dominated international attention. These challenges are real and deserve sustained engagement. Yet they do not tell the whole story. The Horn is also a region of innovation, entrepreneurship, democratic aspiration and growing economic integration. It is home to societies investing in infrastructure, expanding regional trade and strengthening institutions capable of supporting long-term development.
‎
‎The international community should therefore broaden its understanding of stability. Stability is not simply the absence of conflict; it is the presence of capable institutions, accountable governance and public confidence in constitutional processes. These qualities cannot be manufactured quickly in response to crisis. They require patient investment over many years. When societies demonstrate that commitment, international partnerships should reinforce and encourage those efforts.
‎
‎The Rules-Based Order Must Continue to Evolve
‎
‎Europe has consistently championed the importance of a rules-based international order. This commitment has served the international community well by promoting peaceful dispute resolution, sovereign equality and respect for international law. At a time of increasing geopolitical competition, these principles remain indispensable.
‎
‎Yet the strength of any rules-based system depends upon its capacity for renewal. Institutions that cannot adapt to changing political realities risk losing both effectiveness and legitimacy. History demonstrates that international governance has never been static. The institutions created after 1945 have themselves evolved repeatedly in response to decolonisation, economic globalisation and technological transformation.
‎
‎Today’s international landscape presents new questions. How should international institutions engage with societies that demonstrate effective governance despite unusual political circumstances? How should democratic resilience be encouraged in regions facing persistent instability? And how can multilateral organisations remain sufficiently flexible to reward responsible behaviour while preserving the stability of the wider international system?
‎
‎These questions deserve thoughtful consideration rather than ideological responses. Adaptation should never mean abandoning established principles. Rather, it requires applying those principles with consistency while recognising that political realities continue to evolve. An international order perceived as capable of acknowledging successful governance wherever it emerges will ultimately command greater confidence than one viewed as constrained solely by precedent.
‎
‎For Somaliland, this is not simply a matter of national interest. It reflects a broader conviction that international institutions derive their authority from both continuity and responsiveness. They must preserve order while remaining open to political developments that strengthen peace, democracy and regional cooperation.
‎
‎The Horn of Africa and Europe’s Shared Future
‎
‎The strategic importance of the Horn of Africa has never been greater. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait links the Mediterranean with the Indian Ocean through one of the world’s busiest maritime corridors. A significant proportion of global commerce passes through these waters, connecting European markets with Asia, the Gulf and Eastern Africa. The security of this corridor affects energy supplies, commercial shipping and international trade far beyond the region itself.
‎
‎At the same time, the Horn has become an arena in which multiple global powers pursue economic and strategic interests. Investment in ports, logistics, telecommunications and transport infrastructure is reshaping patterns of regional connectivity. Gulf states, European partners, African institutions and Asian economies increasingly recognise the region as central to future commercial networks rather than peripheral to them.
‎
‎Europe therefore has compelling reasons to engage the Horn through a long-term strategic perspective. Such engagement should extend beyond crisis management towards partnerships based upon shared interests and mutual respect. Maritime security, infrastructure development, renewable energy, digital connectivity, higher education and institutional capacity all present opportunities for constructive cooperation.
‎
‎Partnerships of this nature are most successful when they are founded upon reciprocity rather than dependency. African countries increasingly seek relationships that recognise their agency, expertise and capacity for leadership. They wish to contribute to shaping international agendas, not merely respond to them. Europe, with its longstanding commitment to multilateral cooperation and democratic governance, is well placed to cultivate such partnerships.
‎
‎Somaliland’s own aspirations reflect this approach. Our objective is to deepen engagement with partners who value stability, transparency and responsible governance. We believe cooperation is strongest when it is grounded in mutual benefit, shared strategic interests and respect for local ownership.
‎
‎A New Compact Between Europe and Africa
‎
‎For much of the post-Cold War era, relations between Europe and Africa were frequently framed through the language of development assistance. That approach reflected the priorities of its time, particularly where humanitarian crises, conflict and poverty demanded immediate international attention. While development cooperation remains an essential component of the relationship, it is no longer sufficient to define it. Africa today is increasingly characterised by rapid urbanisation, technological innovation, expanding consumer markets and a young population that will play a decisive role in the global economy over the coming decades. The question facing both continents is therefore not simply how Europe can assist Africa, but how Europe and Africa can prosper together through long-term strategic partnership.
‎
‎The Horn of Africa illustrates this transformation particularly clearly. Situated at the intersection of Africa, the Middle East and the Indian Ocean, the region is becoming an increasingly important hub for maritime trade, logistics, energy infrastructure and digital connectivity. Investments in ports, transport corridors and telecommunications are reshaping patterns of commerce that extend far beyond the region itself. These developments should not be viewed solely through the prism of geopolitical competition. They also represent opportunities to build more resilient supply chains, expand regional trade and create sustainable economic growth that benefits both African and European partners.
‎
‎A more mature partnership therefore requires a corresponding shift in mindset. Successful cooperation between Africa and Europe should increasingly be measured not by the volume of aid disbursed but by the quality of investment mobilised, the strength of institutions supported and the opportunities created for businesses, entrepreneurs and young people on both continents. Public finance will continue to play an important catalytic role, particularly in fragile contexts, but long-term prosperity will depend upon creating environments in which private capital, innovation and regional enterprise can flourish.
‎
‎For Europe, such an approach aligns closely with its own strategic interests. Resilient African economies contribute to regional stability, reduce the drivers of irregular migration, strengthen supply chains and create new markets for trade and investment. For African countries, partnerships founded upon transparency, skills transfer and mutual benefit offer a more sustainable path to development than relationships characterised by dependency. The future of Europe-Africa relations should therefore be built less upon the language of assistance and more upon the language of shared opportunity, strategic investment and common prosperity.
‎
‎From Aid to Partnership
‎
‎One of the most significant shifts in international development over recent decades has been the gradual movement away from traditional donor-recipient relationships towards genuine strategic partnerships. This evolution should continue.
‎
‎Development cooperation is most effective when it strengthens domestic institutions rather than substitutes for them. Sustainable economic growth depends not only on investment but also on the rule of law, transparent public administration and predictable regulatory environments. These are responsibilities that ultimately belong to national governments.
‎
‎The role of international cooperation should therefore be to reinforce local capacity, encourage innovation and facilitate mutually beneficial investment. Infrastructure, education, healthcare, digital transformation and climate resilience all require collaboration across borders. Yet these initiatives succeed most consistently when national priorities and local expertise remain central to their design and implementation.
‎
‎Somaliland’s development has been characterised by precisely this emphasis on local ownership. Progress has often been incremental rather than dramatic, reflecting the reality that institution-building is measured in decades rather than election cycles. While significant challenges remain, the experience demonstrates that durable governance emerges through sustained domestic commitment supported by constructive international engagement.
‎
‎This lesson is relevant well beyond the Horn of Africa. As the international community reconsiders development policy in an era of fiscal constraints and geopolitical competition, strengthening capable local institutions may prove among the most valuable investments it can make.
‎
‎A More Confident International Order
‎
‎The future of global governance will not be determined solely by institutional reform or diplomatic negotiation. It will depend equally upon whether the international community retains the confidence to recognise successful governance, encourage democratic resilience and reward those societies that contribute constructively to regional stability.
‎
‎The Horn of Africa is often portrayed as a region defined by its challenges. Yet it is also a region demonstrating remarkable resilience, entrepreneurial energy and political innovation. Its experience reminds us that peace is not simply negotiated; it is built patiently through institutions that command public trust. Democracy is not sustained through declarations alone; it is strengthened through accountable leadership and peaceful political competition. Stability is not inherited; it is earned.
‎
‎These lessons carry implications far beyond one region. As the international system adapts to new geopolitical realities, it must remain anchored in enduring principles while becoming more responsive to demonstrated success. Rules-based governance is strengthened—not weakened—when it recognises those who uphold its values through practical achievement.
‎
‎The future international order should therefore aspire to be more representative, more pragmatic and more attentive to realities on the ground. It should encourage cooperation between regions, support locally led institution-building and recognise that effective governance is among the most valuable contributions any society can make to international peace.
‎
‎From the perspective of Somaliland, this is not simply an aspiration for our own future. It is a proposition for the future of global governance itself. The credibility of the international system will increasingly depend upon its ability to identify, encourage and partner with societies that have demonstrated a sustained commitment to peace, democratic accountability and responsible statecraft. If it succeeds in doing so, it will emerge stronger, more legitimate and better equipped to meet the complex challenges of the twenty-first century.
‎
‎Recognition, Legitimacy, and the Credibility of International Institutions
‎
‎One of the enduring strengths of the international system has been its commitment to principles that promote peace, stability and cooperation among nations. Respect for sovereignty, the peaceful settlement of disputes and adherence to international law remain essential foundations of global order. These principles have helped reduce conflict, facilitate economic integration and provide a common framework through which states can engage with one another. Preserving them remains in the interests of the entire international community.
‎
‎At the same time, every international system must periodically confront the challenge of political change. New realities emerge, governance evolves and institutions develop in ways that were not always anticipated when existing diplomatic frameworks were first established. The resilience of international institutions depends not upon resisting every change, but upon possessing the confidence and flexibility to assess new circumstances carefully, consistently and according to the principles they were created to uphold. Continuity is essential, but so too is the capacity for thoughtful adaptation.
‎
‎This broader question extends beyond any single country or region. It concerns how the international community evaluates effective governance, democratic accountability and long-term contributions to regional peace. Societies that demonstrate a sustained commitment to constitutional government, peaceful political competition and responsible administration strengthen the objectives that the international system seeks to encourage. Recognising and supporting such achievements reinforces the credibility of international institutions because it demonstrates that responsible governance carries tangible value within the rules-based order.
‎
‎For policymakers, particularly in Europe, this presents an opportunity to consider how international engagement can continue to evolve without compromising legal consistency or political stability. A rules-based order derives authority not only from the principles it proclaims but also from the confidence with which it applies them to changing circumstances. Institutions that remain connected to political reality while maintaining fidelity to their founding values are better equipped to command international trust. In an era of profound geopolitical change, that capacity for principled adaptation may become one of the defining characteristics of effective global governance.
‎
‎The experience of Somaliland illustrates why this debate matters in practical terms. For more than three decades, Somaliland has maintained relative peace, conducted competitive elections, developed functioning public institutions and contributed to security in one of the world’s most strategically important regions. Regardless of differing legal or diplomatic perspectives, these achievements represent the very qualities that the international community consistently seeks to encourage: democratic accountability, responsible governance and regional stability.
‎
‎As global governance evolves, there is a strong case for international partners to engage more fully with Somaliland and to give serious consideration to the question of its international recognition. Doing so would not simply acknowledge the progress of one society. It would also reinforce the broader principle that peaceful institution-building, democratic legitimacy and responsible statecraft should be recognised and encouraged wherever they are demonstrably sustained. An international order that is prepared to reward such achievements strengthens its own credibility and sends a powerful signal that constructive governance remains the surest path to international partnership.
‎
‎Confidence Through Adaptation
‎
‎The international order has never been static. Its enduring strength has rested not only on the consistency of its principles but also on its capacity to respond thoughtfully to political change. At moments of geopolitical uncertainty, the temptation is often to defend existing structures through caution alone. Yet history suggests that resilient institutions are those willing to recognise successful governance wherever it emerges, provided it is grounded in democratic legitimacy, the rule of law and a commitment to peaceful cooperation.
‎
‎The experience of the Horn of Africa demonstrates that institution-building, reconciliation and democratic resilience are not the exclusive preserve of established states or long-recognised political systems. They can emerge through local leadership, sustained public consent and patient political compromise. These achievements deserve to be understood not as exceptions to the international order but as contributions to it.
‎
‎For Europe and its partners, the challenge is therefore not simply to preserve the rules-based international system, but to ensure that it remains credible in a changing world. Credibility depends upon consistency, but it also depends upon the confidence to acknowledge political realities that reinforce the very principles the international community seeks to uphold.
‎
‎The future of global governance will be shaped not only in international institutions, but also in societies that demonstrate, through practical achievement, that peace, democratic accountability and responsible governance can flourish under difficult circumstances. Recognising and engaging such partners is not a departure from the rules-based order. It is one of the surest ways of strengthening it for the decades ahead.

By Goth Mohamed Goth

Hargeisa – The Minister of Interior and Security, Abdalle Mohamed Arab, and the Minister of Minerals and Energy, Eng. Ahmed Jama Bare, today signed a landmark agreement at the Ministry of Interior and Security headquarters to formalize the establishment of the Natural Resources Protection Force.

The newly formed unit, whose creation was officially sealed today, will be specifically tasked with safeguarding the nation’s natural wealth. The force will operate as an integral branch of the Somaliland Police Force, a move necessitated by the country’s abundant natural resources which require dedicated security and oversight.

During the signing ceremony, both ministers underscored that the formation of this specialized protection unit meets a critical national need. They stated that the force will be instrumental in monitoring and securing the rich natural endowments with which Somaliland has been blessed, ensuring they are properly managed and protected.

The inter-ministerial agreement signing was witnessed by the Deputy Minister of Interior and Security, Abdirashid Mohamed Ahmed (Magalo), and the Commander of the Somaliland Police Force, Abdi Abdilahi Hassan (Abdilahi-Dheere).