By Alex Dick-Godfrey, Guest blogger

With Kenya’s unilateral decision to enter and create a new buffer state inside Somalia, Ahmed Abdi Godane’s urging this week to kick foreigners out has an audience, and even some logic.

In a recent article on the Daily Maverick, Simon Allison identifies the “surprisingly perceptive” core message of Al Shabab leader Ahmed Abdi Godane’s recent propaganda audio message.

In his message, Mr. Godane urges his Somali comrades to throw out their Kenyan and Ethiopian occupiers. Mr. Allison notes that, although unsettling, Godane is, in certain respects, correct, and is tapping into widespread sentiments.

Despite operating in Somalia under the authority of an African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) to rid the country of Al Shabab, Kenyan and Ethiopian troops are, in fact, occupying Somalia. Their goals are not altruistic, and are largely informed by their own national security and political considerations.

Thus, instead of celebrating the foreign troops’ efforts to stem Al Shabab, Somalis are worried about the out-sized influence being wielded by foreign powers in their country.

Although troubled by these developments, the United States and its partners have other goals in the region that will prevent any significant intrusion into Kenyan or Ethiopian plans.

Godane’s message is particularly striking when considering the formation of federal states in Somalia. In the absence of strong leadership from the Somali Federal Government (SFG), Kenya and Ethiopia have assumed leadership positions as state builders and negotiators in southern Somalia.

In practice, this means that Kenya and Ethiopia have been able to influence the formation of new federal states, and create governments that will benefit their own national security concerns.

As an example of this influence, Kenya and Ethiopia had an important role in the creation of the Interim Juba Administration (IJA), a new federal state consisting of the Somali regions (Gedo, South Juba, and Middle Juba) bordering Kenya.

Effectively, the IJA acts as a buffer state between Kenya and the threat posed by Al Shabab in Somalia.

Ethiopia is involved as a negotiator for the creation of the IJA because it wants to maintain involvement and influence in the region as it deals with its own ethnic Somali population.

Despite disagreements regarding the proposed make-up of this federal state from other regions and conferences in southern Somalia, the SFG has endorsed the IJA because it must maintain Ethiopian and Kenyan support as it battles Al Shabab.

RECOMMENDED: Think you know Africa? Take our geography quiz.

This competition for influence over land in southern Somalia is not likely to lead to a sustainable governance model for Somalia moving forward, and is already causing regional strife.

Somalia would be wise to ensure that whatever governance plan or federal state organization is put in place is durable enough to last after the African Union forces have left, regardless of current security concerns.

Due to the African Union’s recent successes against Al Shabab, various proxy states and vigorous counter terrorism operations by foreign forces seem likely to continue.

Unfortunately this also means that the pattern of Kenyan and Ethiopian meddling in Somalian political affairs is likely to continue.

Godane’s message is dangerous because it taps into that fact.

The US is interested in the long term stability of Somalia. But its immediate concern is to stabilize the Horn of Africa and exterminate Al Shabab. Therefore, despite feeding Al Shabab’s propaganda machine and potentially destabilizing Somalia in the future, the United States will likely turn a blind eye to Kenyan and Ethiopian influence in Somalia.

Mr. Dick-Godfrey is a program coordinator for the Council on Foreign Relations studies program.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of Africa bloggers. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers’ own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs

 Source: The Christian Science Monitor


  1. Somalis may fall for Godane's call to nationalist call to arms if he had demonstrated an iota of nationalism or patriotism or even a glimpse of any pride in Somaliness in his actions or deeds in the past. His face may look Black but his heart and soul is in Asia. The sight of his 'soldiers' wearing Pakistani shalwar Kameez is sufficient to make the average Somali's stomach turn(we know what these Asiatics think of Black people and Blackness)

    His black flag is as Un-Somali as imaginable. I would rather have my house draped in the sickly blue rag of hated Somalia(for a Somalilander it is like Jews putting swastikas up their walls) than come near anywhere near that hate-filled, Un-Somali symbol od darkness and cruelty.

    Having said all of that Ina Godane had already won. Definetely in Somaliland where his ideas are accepted and normalised. They all want Sharia, Niqar, hijar, Vice & Virtue and banning all life and joy. Which is exactly what ina Godane wants. So why not just invite him in?

    I genuinely cannot understand how we can say we hate Al-Shabab and will fight them but accept all they stand for. Just dont get it.