Home Blog Page 38

Somaliland Is Lobbying for U.S. Recognition Next

0

The breakaway territory, recently recognized by Israel and supported by GOP think tanks, hired a lobbying firm with ties to the Trump administration.

The breakaway territory of Somaliland, fresh off establishing formal ties with Israel late last year, is aiming for a much higher diplomatic prize. The government has hired a major firm with ties to the Trump administration to lobby in Washington for U.S. recognition, according to a recent Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filing. Somalia hired its own lobbying firm to counter the offensive, marking a rival influence campaign that could potentially reshape U.S. policy in the Horn of Africa.

Nestpoint, a Dallas-based private equity and government affairs firm, was retained by Somaliland to “develop and execute a comprehensive strategy to secure international recognition…by engaging U.S. government stakeholders,” the filing states. The firm will receive $7,500 a month under the one-year contract that was signed in October and registered under FARA in December, and which also calls for pitching investment in Somaliland. In a December news release published on its website, Nestpoint said it had two goals for its new client: diplomatic recognition and economic self-reliance.

“Their [Nestpoint’s] ability to bridge the gap between diplomatic advocacy and economic development makes them the ideal partner to help Somaliland take its rightful place on the world stage,” read part of a statement attributed to Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi.

Nestpoint is run by a coterie of prominent GOP strategists, including cable TV pundit John Thomas. The firm counts former 2016 Trump campaign field director Stuart Jolly as its chief lobbyist. Jolly, who Trump personally congratulated on stage for his first primary win in New Hampshire, also previously ran the pro-Trump Super PAC, Great America PAC. He is listed as one of the lobbyists in the FARA disclosure.

Somaliland’s move to enter the lobbying arena comes amid a full-court press by influential GOP think tanks to recognize the territory, which has emerged as a strategic battleground in a growing struggle to exert influence over the Horn of Africa region. A Washington Post op-ed by Joshua Meservey, a fellow at the neoconservative Hudson Institute, said recognition was “recognizing reality.” Michael Rubin, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, went as far as to say U.S. recognition would prevent a war between Somaliland and Somalia—despite Israeli recognition already triggering threats of armed confrontation and separatist violence.

Despite calls to embrace Somaliland, Nestpoint faces an uphill battle in Washington. A bill to recognize Somaliland was introduced in the House last June but never got out of committee. Despite some high-profile supporters, like Sen. Ted Cruz, most members of Congress have eschewed calls for recognition. Throughout his second term, President Trump has disparaged Somalia, and the Somali people, often referring to Somalia as “not even a country,” while indicating in numerous public comments that he is not ready to recognize the breakaway state.

Somalia, already contracted with a major K-Street lobbying firm, BGR Group, hired another lobbying shop in September, according to a recent disclosure. The $44,000 per-month contract with Virginia-based Arsenal Government and Public Affairs Group lays out that Arsenal will “engage with U.S. Executive Branch officials and staff to inform them of client’s public policy views, and to create media opportunities for client to increase public awareness of those views and policies.”

Among those policies, it notes, is security cooperation—likely a reference to the fight against al-Shabaab, an al-Qaeda-affiliated militant group that controls large swaths of the country. The firm boasts that it secured Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud an interview on a Newsmax program in October. Mohamud repeatedly praised President Trump in that interview for his administration’s counterterrorism policy in Somalia, highlighting U.S. airstrikes that targeted al-Shabaab militants the previous month.

The Arsenal Group is run by Christopher Neiweem, an Iraq-war veteran who has been a registered lobbyist since 2013, records show. The filing lists Trump associate Roger Stone as a co-leader of the lobbying campaign, though Stone has denied any ties to The Arsenal Group. In a post last month on his X account, Stone acknowledged that he had previously met the Somali ambassador to the United States, Dahir Hassan Abdi, but declined to represent them. He wrote that seeing his name on the filing “took me by surprise” and said his lawyers had demanded it be removed. Stone had briefly lobbied for an American company with commodity interests in Somalia during the first Trump administration.

Neiweem declined to comment.

 

Read in the Substack app

Open app

 

TELESOM GROUP LAUNCHES ITS NATIONWIDE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

Press Release

lt is with immense pride and honor that we, in partnership with the educational authorities of the Republic of Somaliland—specifically the National Examination Office—officially announce the distinguished recipients of the Telesom Group Scholarship Program for this year.

This prestigious cohort comprises the nation’s highest-achieving students from the 2024-2025 academic year. In line with our core values of empowerment and inclusivity, the program gives particular priority to two groups:

  1. High-Potential, Underprivileged Students: Exceptional scholars who have demonstrated outstanding academic merit but lack the financial means to pursue university education.
  2. Students with Disabilities: Talented individuals who have excelled in their studies, ensuring equal access to higher education opportunities.

All selected scholars have earned a distinguished ‘A’ grade in their national examinations, reflecting their dedication and intellectual caliber.

A defining feature of this initiative is its truly national character. The recipients hail from every region across Somaliland, underscoring our commitment to equitable access and national development by identifying and nurturing talent from all corners of the country.

Telesom Group’s sponsorship is comprehensive. We are fully committed to covering the complete university costs for each scholar throughout their entire degree program. This investment is a testament to our unwavering dedication to fostering education, building human capital, and contributing to the future prosperity of Somaliland.

We extend our heartfelt congratulations to the scholars and look forward to their continued success.

Somaliland Recognition and Regional Stability Discussed in U.S.-Waddani Party Meeting

0

The Chairman of the Waddani Party in the United States, Mr. Ahmed Nur Abd (Axmed Nuur Cabdi), has commented on a meeting he held with the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Ms. Molly Phee. The discussion focused on matters concerning the recognition of Somaliland and the broader situation in the Horn of Africa.

The Chairman stated that the meeting involved an in-depth discussion on the question of Somaliland’s recognition and the growing role of international powers in the region, particularly Turkey.

Ahmed Nur Abd noted that while the U.S. side showed a sufficient understanding of the facts on the ground in the region and the arguments concerning Somaliland, they hoped to see a substantive shift in international policy.

The Chairman highlighted that Turkey continues to place significant emphasis on supporting a centralized Somali government structure, despite Somalia’s prolonged challenges with security, governance, and political stability.

He argued that this approach risks sidelining stable and constructive regional partners, such as Somaliland, which possesses its own peace, functioning institutions, and a maturing democratic process.

The Waddani Party Chairman stressed that the current moment demands a policy rooted in pragmatism and tangible outcomes, rather than adherence to outdated approaches that have contributed little to the Horn of Africa’s long-term stability.

In conclusion, Ahmed Nur Abd stated that unless the role of international powers in the region is reevaluated, the capacity of countries like Turkey to meaningfully contribute to the future peace and stability of the Horn of Africa could be constrained.

Opposition Leader Accuses President Deni of Turning Puntland into a ‘Private Syndicate,’ Citing International Report”

0

By Jama Ayaanle Feyte

Puntland, Somalia – Dr. Guled Salah Barre, a prominent opposition figure, has publicly leveled serious allegations of systemic corruption and resource plunder in the Sanaag region. He asserts that the exploitation is being masterminded by a private commercial entity whose primary beneficiaries are Puntland President Said Abdullahi Deni and his inner circle of close associates and family members.

In a published statement, Dr. Guled framed the issue as a profound betrayal of public trust:

“It is a profound tragedy that the warnings we have sounded for so long are now incontrovertibly confirmed by hard, official evidence. President Deni has fundamentally perverted the Puntland government, transforming it from a public institution into a private syndicate for himself and his clique. This systematic hijacking of the state constitutes a devastating assault on the very foundations of governance and the social contract with the people.”

He further escalated his accusations by citing international validation:

“The situation has now reached a point where it is being documented by global watchdog organizations. A recent investigative report by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC) explicitly details the mechanisms through which President Deni and his relatives are illicitly leveraging state authority to siphon off and plunder the nation’s collective wealth and natural resources.”

Dr. Guuleed concluded by emphasizing this is a long-standing pattern, not an isolated incident:

“This exposed plunder is not a new development. On numerous occasions, I have fulfilled my civic duty by raising responsible alarms about this ongoing, orchestrated theft from the people of Puntland.”

The Geopolitical Mask: Why Turkey’s Role in Somaliland-Somalia Engagement is Inherently Compromised

0

by Jama Ayaanle Feyte

The recent diplomatic friction triggered by growing Israel–Somaliland cooperation has laid bare a fundamental reality: Turkey’s posture in the Horn of Africa is not that of a disinterested peacemaker, but of a strategic stakeholder. Ankara’s opposition to Somaliland’s external engagements is a calculated move to preserve its own influence, not a principled stand for Somali unity. This revelation fundamentally disqualifies Turkey from any claim to impartial mediation between Somaliland and Somalia. A truly neutral broker operates without vested interests in the outcome; Turkey, however, has a profound geopolitical and economic investment in maintaining a specific regional architecture—one where its influence in Mogadishu remains paramount and Somaliland’s sovereignty remains unacknowledged.

From Principle to Realpolitik: The Strategic Calculus Behind the Rhetoric

Turkey’s appeals to the sanctity of Somali territorial integrity and Islamic solidarity are often misread as ideological drivers. In practice, they serve as potent rhetorical tools for a more concrete aim: containing Somaliland’s international agency. An active, diplomatically recognized Somaliland would forge its own trade partnerships, establish independent security cooperation, and diversify its diplomatic portfolio. This autonomy directly threatens Ankara’s model of influence, which has been built on being a dominant external patron to the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) in Mogadishu. A strong, recognized Somaliland would rewire the Horn’s geopolitical circuits, creating new centers of power and partnership outside Turkey’s orbit. Therefore, what is framed as a principled commitment to “unity” is, in essence, a strategic imperative to maintain a dependent and centralized Somali political entity that Ankara can more easily influence.

The Military Gambit: Arming Instability and Enabling Hostility

Critically, Turkey’s patronage has escalated beyond diplomacy and development into direct military enablement. Ankara has become the primary arsenal for the fragile FGS, providing advanced weaponry—including armed drones, armored vehicles, and most provocatively, F-16 fighter jets—to a government plagued by instability and internal fissures. This military infusion is not a stabilizing force for Somalia; it is a tool of geopolitical coercion and a dangerously provocative act. Turkey is arming a central authority whose officials have, at times, publicly declared hostile intentions toward Somaliland and its people, recalling the tragic prelude to the civil war three decades ago. By choosing to disproportionately arm one side with advanced capabilities, Turkey is not mediating a dispute—it is taking a militarized side, directly threatening the peace and security Somaliland has painstakingly built for over thirty years. This action proves Turkey is not a peacemaker but an active participant fueling a dangerous imbalance and empowering revanchist agendas in Mogadishu.

The Irrelevance of the Davutoğlu Era: A Changed Somaliland in a New World

Any notion of resurrecting the mediation framework of the 2012–2013 period—often associated with former Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s “zero problems with neighbors” policy—is a geopolitical fantasy. That model presumed a certain level of Turkish paternalistic leverage and a Somaliland more willing to subsume its aspirations for the sake of a Turkish-brokered dialogue. The Somaliland of today operates from a position of hardened strategic foresight and hard-won confidence. It meticulously selects reliable partners, manages its own affairs with deliberate sovereignty, and pursues recognition through a confident, independent diplomatic corps that engages directly with capitals worldwide. This evolved reality renders obsolete any mediation tactic that seeks to infantilize Somaliland or pressure it into concessions under the banner of an outdated “unity” framework. Attempts to impose such antiquated models will not only fail but risk destabilizing the region by creating unrealistic expectations and fostering resentment, especially when the purported mediator is simultaneously arming the other party.

The Somaliland Doctrine: Sovereignty, Strategy, and Steadfast Diplomacy

For the Republic of Somaliland, the path forward is non-negotiable and clearly defined. Its recognition will be secured not in the negotiating rooms of third-party capitals, but through steadfast, strategic, and sovereign diplomacy. This means:

  1. Deepening Alliances with Trustworthy Partners: Engaging with states that respect Somaliland’s constitutional sovereignty and engage with it as a genuine counterpart, not a political abstraction.
  2. Institutional Defense: Vigilantly protecting its legitimate, democratically tested institutions from any diplomatic process that seeks to bypass or undermine them, especially when faced with a militarily empowered adversary.
  3. Learning from History: Rejecting any dialogue format that replicates the imbalanced conditions of the past or that is overseen by a party actively undermining its security. Somaliland’s proven record of state-building must be the foundation, not ignored in favor of abstract political projects enforced by foreign arms.

Dialogue conducted under externally dictated formats, on uneven footing, or under the shadow of a mediator who arms one side, is not a path to peace; it is a recipe for unraveling three decades of monumental state-building achievement. It would dishonor the stability Somaliland has carved out in a turbulent region and further delay the international recognition it has indisputably earned.

Conclusion: Discarding the Mediation Theater

The conclusion is inescapable and grave: Turkey cannot be, and has never been, an honest broker. Its significant military, economic, and political investments in Mogadishu—now catastrophically extended to providing F-16s and other offensive weapons—combined with its clear strategic interest in limiting Somaliland’s international ascent, create an irreconcilable and actively dangerous conflict of interest. Turkey is not facilitating peace; it is bankrolling a potential conflict and resurrecting the specter of past violence to serve its own imperial nostalgia.

The future of any engagement between Somaliland and Somalia—if it is to have any chance of success—must be structured on a foundation of mutual and direct respect, free from the overbearing and militarized shadow of a mediator with its own agenda. The international community must see the mediation theater for what it is: a geopolitical facade for aggressive patronage that threatens regional stability.

Somaliland’s destiny is being written in Hargeisa, through its institutions and its diplomatic perseverance. Its rightful place in the community of nations will be secured by partners who engage with it on its own terms: as the de facto sovereign state it has been for over thirty years, not as a subordinate actor in a geopolitical drama directed—and armed—from Ankara. The era of imbalanced, interest-driven, and militarized mediation is over. Somaliland’s march toward recognition will continue, with or without the permission of those whose influence depends on its denial.

Mr. Jama Ayaanle Feyte, Somaliland-born politician, Journalist, and Horn of Africa political analyst

Somaliland moves toward Israel trade pact, signals access to lithium and minerals

0

Following Israeli recognition, Somaliland is seeking a trade and investment deal and has signaled willingness to offer access to key minerals.

Somaliland expects to reach a trade agreement soon with Israel, the first country to recognise its independence, and is willing to offer rights to valuable mineral deposits as part of a deal, its leader said in an interview with Reuters.

Israel, in late December, became the first country to recognise the Republic of Somaliland, a northeastern part of Somalia that has claimed independence for decades. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel would seek immediate cooperation in agriculture, health, technology, and the economy.

‎He said he had accepted an invitation from Netanyahu and would visit Israel soon, but no date had yet been set. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar visited Somaliland a month ago.


‎Abdullahi said he expects all United Nations member states to eventually follow Israel’s lead, including the United Arab Emirates and the United States, though he said it was normal for recognition to take time.

‎He said he had a good working relationship with the US and believes President Donald Trump will “someday” recognise Somaliland. Last month, he pitched investment deals at a dinner in Davos attended by Trump’s son Eric.

‎Israel’s decision to recognise Somaliland has drawn an angry response from Somalia, and has also been criticised by China, Turkey, Egypt, and the African Union.

‎Somaliland also cooperates with the UAE, with DP World a big investor in the Berbera port. The UAE has “not decided officially yet, but they are just one of the countries we expect to recognise Somaliland,” Abdullahi said.

‎”We also expect that the Saudi government will make the same investment in Somaliland,” he said.

The Somali gold rush: ‎Milxo and the ungoverned mining frontier ‎

0

Milxo and the ungoverned mining frontier

Milxo is a tiny mining settlement in a remote and contested region of north-eastern Somalia that, over the past decade, has become the site of one of Africa’s least-known gold booms. What was little more than a cluster of structures housing a few hundred people in 2016 has expanded into a sprawling settlement of an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 residents, drawing prospectors from across Somalia and from abroad, including Sudan, Yemen, Tanzania and Ethiopia. This rapid growth has brought new livelihoods to a neglected region, but it has unfolded in a legal and political vacuum marked by contested sovereignty, weak governance and insecurity.

Milxo lies in a region claimed at various times by Puntland, Somaliland and the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS), and more recently by the SSC-Khatumo administration, which received formal recognition from the FGS in 2023. No authority exercises effective control over the area. Local miners describe Milxo as a ‘free zone’ in which no authority regulates extraction, issues licences or enforces taxation. As a result, gold mining has developed without a codified legal framework, with Puntland lacking a functioning extractives regime and the FGS maintaining that mining activity in Milxo is illegal under federal law.

Within this vacuum, a fragmented and unregulated mining economy has emerged. Field research documented 20 mining sites operated by at least 18 commercial entities, many employing foreign technical workers and using rudimentary and hazardous extraction methods, including widespread mercury use and cyanide leaching plants. Very few of these operators appear to hold licences from Puntland authorities, and Puntland has no binding mining law in force. The only identifiable state revenue from the gold trade is a nominal customs levy collected at Bosaso airport, representing a fraction of potential income and often absent from official accounts.

The absence of regulation has created conditions conducive to elite capture and armed-group exploitation. Evidence collected by the GI-TOC indicates that at least one major operator is linked to Puntland’s president. Al-Shabaab, which maintains a presence in the nearby Golis Mountains, has repeatedly attempted to tax or infiltrate mining operations. While the extent of revenue derived from gold is contested, phone records and eyewitness accounts indicate ongoing extortion activity, often framed as zakat.

Milxo’s gold enters the global supply chain with minimal scrutiny. Almost all exports flow to Dubai, typically carried by couriers on commercial flights. Reported imports of Somali gold into the United Arab Emirates have nearly doubled since 2017, rising from 2.8 tonnes to more than five tonnes in 2023. Despite recent regulatory changes, enforcement appears uneven, and couriers report that documentation on origin or compliance is rarely requested.

This report traces the evolution of the Milxo gold rush, documents mining practices, maps supply chains from mine to market, and examines how unregulated extraction intersects with elite networks, armed groups and Somalia’s incomplete federal system. It provides the first comprehensive assessment of how an ungoverned goldfield in northern Somalia has become embedded in the global gold market.

Jay-Bahadur-The-Somali-gold-rush-Milxo-and-the-ungoverned-mining-frontier-GI-TOC-January-2026

A New Era in Sahil: Inaugurating the Modernized WADDANI Headquarters in Berbera

0

By Jama Ayaanle Feyte

Berbera – It was a great honor for me to inaugurate the WADDANI Party Headquarters in the Sahil region and the city of Berbera. I extend my deepest gratitude to everyone who contributed their effort and dedication to prepare this headquarters, for which the regional and district leadership are responsible.

This headquarters is part of our ongoing initiative to reorganize and modernize the offices of the ruling WADDANI Party. This transformation will ensure the party stands firmly on its own feet, truly owns and serves the nation and its people, and secures the successes it is known for—just as it historically has by winning the public’s mandate and forming the government.

To the loyal supporters of WADDANI, the people who steadfastly align with the party, contribute daily to its cause, and ultimately bring us victory: I am profoundly grateful. I say to you: thank you very much. We have specially furnished this spacious office, and we particularly entrust its care and activity to the people of Sahil.

Disarmament and Statehood: Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah and Somaliland’s National Army

0

Abstract

This article contends that the emergence of today’s Somaliland National Army — and, by extension, Somaliland’s very survival as a political order — cannot be explained solely by institutional design or peace negotiations. Rather, Somaliland’s transition from armed pluralism to statehood hinged on a single foundational act: the voluntary, first-mover disarmament of the Arab (Arap) clan under Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah in early 1994. Through a close reading of the disarmament process and eyewitness quotations, this study shows how Sultan Farah’s moral authority transformed fear into trust, enabled the surrender of weapons without coercion, and made possible the consolidation of a national military force. Without this intervention, the logic of mutual fear would likely have persisted indefinitely, precluding the formation of today’s Somaliland National Army and, with it, Somaliland’s survival as a functioning polity.

Introduction

On 2 February 1994, what would become the Somaliland National Army Day unfolded at Hargeisa Stadium not as a mere ceremony but as a defining political act. Militia units from the Somali National Movement (SNM) — including the distinguished Sancaani Brigade — handed over weapons to the nascent government. This moment marked the beginning of the transition from clan-controlled arms to a unified national military. Yet this transfer did not occur through coercion or external guarantees. It occurred because one leader chose to act where others hesitated.

This article argues that without Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah of the Arab (Arap) clan, Somaliland would not exist today in anything resembling its current form. His decision to initiate disarmament reshaped the political landscape, making possible a national army and the sovereign authority it supports.

Post-Liberation Security Dilemma: Independence without Control

After the fall of the Somali Republic in 1991, Somaliland declared independence and emerged from war with fragile unity but deep insecurity. Weapons remained distributed widely among clan-based militias. Every community recognized that peace required disarmament, but no group was willing to move first. The logic was simple and brutal: disarm first, and risk annihilation.

The newly elected government under President Mohamed Haji Ibrahim Egal had moral authority but no monopoly on force. There was no army to command, no police to enforce order, and no external peacekeeper to guarantee security. Disarmament was repeatedly acknowledged as necessary, yet not a single clan was willing to take the first step.

In this context, fear ruled. Political speeches, religious appeals, and consensus statements repeatedly concluded with the same outcome: “not yet.”

Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah and the First-Mover Problem

Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah’s authority was rooted in lineage, mediation, and longstanding respect across Somaliland. As the overall Sultan of the Arab (Arap) clan and an early supporter of the Somali National Movement, his influence transcended ordinary customary authority. Where political leaders were constrained by institutional weakness, he possessed the moral capital to act first.

At a key Borama meeting in January 1994 — convened to address disarmament — discussions stalled once again. Elders and commanders acknowledged the necessity of disarmament, but each insisted that others should go first.

It was in this atmosphere that Sultan Farah spoke:

“A nation cannot be built on fear. A people cannot be governed by guns. Let us remove the steel from our hands so that trust may return to our hearts.”

This statement did not demand obedience; it invited courage. As recounted by Haji Cabdi Waraabe, Sultan Farah followed it with an unprecedented pledge:

“The Arap clan will disarm first.”

For a brief moment, the room was stunned. No clan had ever declared such a willingness to take the first step. Sultan Farah was not asking for assurances, nor promising guarantees from others. He was offering trust without conditions — a radical inversion of the logic that had paralyzed Somaliland since the war’s end.

Disarmament as a Moral and Political Act

Sultan Farah’s words mattered not simply because they were eloquent, but because they were credible. He did not rush to command; he spoke after years of service, mediation, and demonstrated commitment to collective survival. His moral authority was the resource that allowed him to transform fear into a political possibility.

Returning to Baligubadle, Sultan Farah convened a grand clan assembly — inclusive of elders, former fighters, youth, and religious leaders — to explain the proposal and secure genuine consent. Speaking plainly about the stakes, he addressed the central fear:

“We will disarm not because we are weak, but because we are strong enough to trust ourselves.”

When his people raised practical fears — “Other clans will attack us,” “We will be defenseless,” “This is a trap” — he did not dismiss them. Instead, he offered a moral boundary around violence:

“If anyone attacks you, they must face me first. And if they attack our clan, we will take their weapons as our only response.”

This was neither a threat of revenge nor a promise of dominance. It was an assurance that strength would be used to end violence, not perpetuate it. In that moment, the psychology of fear began to shift. Disarmament became an act of honor rather than vulnerability.

2 February 1994: From Clan Arms to a National Army

On 2 February 1994, the formal disarmament ceremony at Hargeisa Stadium became the birth event of the Somaliland National Army. The Sancaani Brigade — among the SNM’s most experienced units — voluntarily handed over weapons, including rifles and artillery, to the government. This was more than a procedural transfer; it was a public affirmation that the state, not clans, would henceforth hold legitimate force.

At the event, Sultan Farah declared:

“Our clan will be the first to disarm. Whether medals are awarded or certificates are given, we will lead the way.”

The stadium responded with celebration, and President Egal honored Sultan Farah and the Arab (Arap) clan with medals, recognizing the courage and precedent set by their decision.

President Egal later reflected:

“Sultan Mohamed built the nation with one act of courage. He gave Somaliland its future.”

This was not mere rhetoric. It was a recognition that the army was born the day weapons were surrendered without coercion, and that surrender was made possible by Sultan Farah’s moral decision.

From One Act to National Transformation

The Arab (Arap) clan’s disarmament triggered a cascade effect. Other clans followed, not because they were compelled, but because the meaning of honor and legitimacy had shifted. Disarmament became a symbol of moral strength, not weakness. Weapons ceased to be primary sources of security; trust and shared commitment became the currency of peace.

Within months, the majority of SNM fighters had demobilized, heavy weapons were surrendered, illegal checkpoints disappeared, and roads reopened. As armed authority consolidated, conversations shifted from survival to organization: policing, coordination, civilian authority.

The Somaliland National Army did not emerge simply as an institution; it emerged as a social contract grounded in voluntary restraint.

Conclusion

The existence of today’s Somaliland National Army — and the relative peace and stability that characterize Somaliland — rests on a pivotal causal sequence driven by one leader’s decision. Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah’s willingness to absorb risk and place his own people at the forefront of disarmament transformed a deadlocked society into a state capable of governing itself.

Somaliland was not made solely through declarations or conferences. It was made in 1994, when one leader chose to lower arms first and ask others to follow — invoking trust where there was fear, and imagining a nation where there was fragmentation.

On this 32nd anniversary of Somaliland National Army Day, that foundational act remains the moral and political bedrock of Somaliland’s development and progress.

Without Sultan Mohamed Sultan Farah’s courage, there would be no Somaliland National Army. Without that army, there would be no Somaliland today.

Gulaid Yusuf Idaan

Independent Researcher

Specialist in Conflict Resolution, Disarmament, and Horn of Africa Politics

 

 

Somaliland Central Bank Empowers Staff with Islamic Finance Training

0

Hargeisa, Somalia — The Central Bank of Somaliland has successfully concluded a three-day intensive training program in Islamic banking and economics for its management and staff, as part of its broader push to strengthen financial sector capabilities.

Organized in collaboration with the Al-Huda Islamic Banking and Economics Organization, the program was designed to deepen the bank’s expertise in Islamic financial services. It covered nine modules—two delivered remotely—and was led by senior specialists with extensive experience in the field.

Participants examined international best practices in Islamic banking and discussed how to tailor such frameworks to Somaliland’s economic landscape. Senior officials who attended hailed the training as “highly beneficial” and pledged to integrate the new knowledge directly into their day-to-day roles.

“This training is not a one-off event, but part of our continuous effort to build a strong, capable institution,” stated Central Bank Governor Abdinasir Ahmed Hersi during the closing ceremony. He emphasized that developing local expertise is central to advancing Somaliland’s financial markets and service quality.

Deputy Governor Hamse Abdiraman Khayre echoed this commitment, stressing that the lessons learned must translate into practical application across the bank’s operations. “Knowledge should not remain theoretical—it must be implemented to achieve real progress,” he said.

At the end of the training, certificates were awarded to all participants, including managers, directors, and support staff. The initiative reflects the bank’s long-term strategy to strengthen governance, enhance service delivery, and support the development of a robust Islamic finance sector in Somaliland.